I've been sort of roped slightly into doing a site for someone and have been looking at several options.
Only recently started playing with Google Sites expecting it would be fairly good, but on reflection I'm quite impressed at what you can do with it.
Immediately, I should mention that I expect to shape the site, deliver it and handover the day to day publishing since I don't much fancy being a glorified typist.
So the Google offering allows me to:
- Create a site in moments. Really, it is that simple.
- Create forms to capture input. This works pretty well, data is captured to a Google spreadsheet
- Create a photo slideshow from a Picasa album
- Setup page links and hierarchical structures
- Secure the site
- Host comments and attachments
- Other things, go Google for yourself.
I'm no stranger to web development. I recognise that Google have limited the features more advanced users may want. So I can't for example use iFrame's, JavaScript and a bunch of other things. This makes site mashups tricky if not impossible, a shame in the 2.0 world... It's a tradeoff though.
But the elegance of the product really leaves me wondering if it's not just perfect for my needs. It's just so darned quick to throw up posts and alter basic content, and after all content is king right?
What do you think?
Would you use it?
Have you created a site for someone else less technical than you to then take over and publish to?
What did you use?
No comments:
Post a Comment